Dr. Eve De Rosa, Co-Director

1. Attentional modulation of learning across the lifespan in humans.

This line of research examines the processes underlying the brain’s capacity to flexibly and dynamically enhance attentional processing. My theoretical framework distinguished the attentional function of boosting the relevant (signal) and reduce processing of the irrelevant (noise), both of which contribute to optimization of goal-directed behavior. We show acetylcholine is central to the latter attentional function and thus their differential degradation as we age.

  • Dixon, M.L.*, Ruppel, J.*, Pratt, J. & De Rosa, E. (2009) Learning to Ignore: Acquisition of Sustained Attentional Suppression. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 418-423.
  • Dixon, M.L.*, Zelazo, P. David & De Rosa E. (2010) Evidence for Intact Memory-guided Attention in School-Aged Children. Developmental Science, 13, 161-69
  • Schmitz, T.W.*, Cheng, F.* & De Rosa, E. (2010) Failing to ignore: Paradoxical neural effects of perceptual load on early attentional selection in normal ageing. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 14750-8
  • Schmitz, T.W.*, Dixon, M.L.*, Anderson, A.K. & De Rosa, E. (2014) Distinguishing attentional gain and tuning in young and older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 5, 2514-25
  • 2. Cholinergic modulation of attention in rats.

    While the cognitive mechanisms and functional neuroanatomy of attention have been well examined by the human cognitive literature, the neurochemistry and specific downstream neuroanatomical contributions of attention are less well-known. The basal forebrain provides cholinergic neuromodulatory input to the entire cortical mantle, including frontal and parietal cortices, and it has been implicated in attentional processing in nonhuman animals. We demonstrate across rats and humans that the cholinergic basal forebrain is a critical neural substrate for the regulation of attention.

  • Botly, L.C.P.* & De Rosa, E. (2008) Acetylcholine, attention, and feature binding: A cross-species investigation. Psychological Science, 19, 1185-93
  • Botly, L.C.P.* & De Rosa, E. (2009) Cholinergic deafferentation of the neocortex using 192 IgG-saporin impairs feature binding in rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 4120-4130. Recommended by the Faculty of 1000
  • Botly, LCP* & De Rosa, E. (2012) Using visual search to examine cholinergic contributions to feature binding in the rat Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2441-2453
  • Ljubojevic, V.*, Luu, P.*, Gill, P.R.*, Beckett, LA*, Takehara-Nishiuchi, K. & De Rosa, E. (2018) Cholinergic modulation of Frontoparietal Cortical Network Dynamics Supporting Supramodal Attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 3988-4005
  • 3. Cholinergic modulation of mnemonic interference in rats and humans.

    Proactive interference (PI) is the impairing influence of past learning on the acquisition of new, related information. Using cholinergic pharmacology and cholinergic specific immunotoxic-lesion data, we demonstrate that efficient resolution of PI depends on adequate acetylcholine originating from the basal forebrain in a rodent model and using fMRI in humans.

  • De Rosa, E. & Hasselmo, M.E. (2000) Muscarinic cholinergic neuromodulation reduces proactive interference between stored odor memories during acquisition learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114, 32-41. Awarded the D.G. Marquis Behavioral Neuroscience Award, American Psychological Association
  • De Rosa, E. & Sullivan, E.V. (2003) Enhanced release from proactive interference in nonamnesic alcoholics: Implications for impaired associative binding. Neuropsychology, 17, 469-481.
  • De Rosa, E., Desmond, J.E., Anderson, A.K., Pfefferbaum, A., & Sullivan, E.V. (2004). The human basal forebrain supports integration of new with old learning. Neuron, 41, 825-837.
  • Caplan, J.B.*, McIntosh, A.R. & De Rosa, E. (2007) Two Distinct Neuromodulatory Functional Networks for Successful Resolution of Proactive Interference. Cerebral Corte17, 1650-1663.
  • 4. Cholinergic modulation of mnemonic interference in rats and humans.

    The cholinergic basal forebrain, in particular the NBM, regulates subcortical targets, including the amygdala. We have examined how affective experience engages the amygdala in different ways to supports the regulation of attention. Affective states regulate activity in BF afferent structures, including the amygdala and medial OFC, which in conjunction are shown to alter the functional connectivity between primary and extrastriate visual cortices, simultaneously modulate both affective feelings and attention.

  • Anderson, A.K., Christoff, K., Panitz, D., De Rosa E. & Gabrieli J.D.E. (2003) Neural correlates of the automatic processing of threat facial signals. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5627-5633.
  • Schmitz, T.W.*, De Rosa, E. & Anderson, A.K. (2009) Opposing influences of affective state valence on visual cortical encoding. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7199-207
  • Markello, RD,* Spreng, RN, Luh, WM, Anderson, AK, De Rosa, E. (2018) Segregation of the human basal forebrain using resting state functional MRI. NeuroImage, 173, 287-297.
  • Li., X.*, Swallow, K., Chiu, M., De Rosa, E. & Anderson, A.K. (2018) Does the body give the brain an attentional boost? Examining the relationship between attentional and cardiac gating. Biological Psychology, 139, 124-130.
  • Scroll to Top